Re: SQL vs. traditional I/O? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: SQL vs. traditional I/O?
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:04:42 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joe Pluta wrote:

In the spirit of peer review ... could you post the source code for
the test programs?

Fill the file with 800,000 records (use a write loop).  Then add keys
with the following SQL (see, I know when to use SQL! <grin>):


Thanks Joe.

I would like to invite other people to take Joes program and run it in their own environment and post the results. Joe probably ran his tests on a single system ... and I know his is not the fastest in the world.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.