RE: SQL vs. traditional I/O? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: SQL vs. traditional I/O?
From: "Dan Bale" <dbale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:42:02 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / James W. Kilgore
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 12:13 PM
> 
> The open source WyattERP used such a data definition application and 
> generated the DDS (among other things) and could just as easily create 
> the DDL.

"used", as in past tense?  No longer available?

Otherwise, where can I find this?

tia, 
db

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.