Re: IBM overhauls iSeries for the long haul

[michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Guess it's just different markets. Domino is a non-starter around
here...and I don't know anyone that uses Domino on iSeries.

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:09:17 -0500, rob@xxxxxxxxx said:
> Domino actually sold iSeries.  Local BP's were actually stumbling into 
> shops that had iSeries only to run Domino.  IBM did an extensive
> marketing 
> campaign at one LotusSphere for the iSeries.  Lines of hordes of people
> to 
> their display were actually blocking the displays to other hardware 
> vendors.  Granted, getting a chance to win a hot sports car versus a DVD 
> player or a hunk of foam had a lot to do with it.  But the marketing 
> worked.
> 
> We bought extra iSeries's to run Domino only applications.
> 
> I wonder how many people went out and bought the iSeries solely because
> it 
> ran OV/400?
> 
> I liked the OV/400 word processor.  And I loved IBM Support Line people's 
> support of it!  And I did get some users to use the calendaring, etc. 
> But 
> people do like their GUI.
> 
> Rob Berendt
> -- 
> Group Dekko Services, LLC
> Dept 01.073
> PO Box 2000
> Dock 108
> 6928N 400E
> Kendallville, IN 46755
> http://www.dekko.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 08/17/2004 02:31 PM
> Please respond to
> Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> To
> "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
> 
> Fax to
> 
> Subject
> Re: IBM overhauls iSeries for the long haul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Because they wanted to move people to Domino so they could make more
> money.
> 
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:25:23 -0400, "Pat Barber"
> <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > This whole OV/400 thing just makes me crazy. First
> > they make HUGE announcements that it's gonna die,
> > and it doesn't die, then they announce even more
> > stuff and it doesn't die, and now here we are four
> > or five years later, and it still works.
> > 
> > I don't think I will ever understand why they didn't
> > simply leave wrkdoc and prtdoc alone. This was done
> > with other older software such as BGU, which works
> > just fine to this very day.
> > 
> > Pete Helgren wrote:
> > 
> > > Pat,
> > > 
> > > We took the existing 720 to V5R3M0 and then did a Save option 21 and a
> > > restore to both i5/OS partitions (well, it was a little more complex 
> but
> > > basically that was it).  It works fine.  They primarily use it for 
> mail
> > > merges to create mailing labels and letters.  Don't think anyone uses 
> it for
> > > daily letter writing  :)
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> > list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> > 
> -- 
>  
>   michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
> 
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
-- 
  
  michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx