Dan Bale wrote:
 
> A serious question:  Now that you have done it, would you say that you would
> have been better off just writing the RPG program?

Not at all. Writing an RPG program with a display file, or a C program
with simple "printf" statements, would have at best been only slightly
faster, and might indeed have taken longer. Writing an RPG program with
a *PNLGRP, or a C program with either a DSPF or a *PNLGRP would have
almost certainly taken quite a bit longer.

Besides which, 
(1) I now have a sample *PNLGRP application that I can use as a skeleton
for future projects,
(2) I've learned how to use a tool that's powerful enough that IBM
generally uses it in preference to DSPFs, and
(3) Having added a *PNLGRP to the product in question, I had a place
where I could hang command prompt help for the product's *CMDs (a
trivial exercise, but a relaxing one).

-- 
James H. H. Lampert
Professional Dilettante
http://www.hb.quik.com/jamesl
http://members.hostedscripts.com/antispam.html
http://www.thehungersite.com

Help America's Passenger Trains. http://www.saveamtrak.org

Read My Lips: No More Atrocities!


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.