132 to 112 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: 132 to 112
From: "Muralidhar Narayana" <Muralidhar_Narayana@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:55:13 +0530
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We have QCLLESRC as 132 bytes long. 

We are planning to change QCLLESRC to 112 to prevent certain errors in turnover 
,Would there be any issues in the long run if we change from 132 to 112? Do we 
have to take any specific things into consideration?

Thanks in advance,

Regards,

Murali.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.