Re: Suggested CL enhancement - <> -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Suggested CL enhancement - <>
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:28:27 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

James Rich wrote:

I personally prefer "!=" over "<>" but since the latter is already in RPG, I guess being consistent is good.

!= would be ok, but only if we used == to indicate equality. Since RPG already uses <>, I think that should be supported in CL too.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.