RE: Microsoft thwarted again -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Microsoft thwarted again
From: PaulMmn <PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:10:49 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I think it is a *very* valid comparison between M$ and *GNU/Linux*. If Intel-based GNU/Linux distributions had been available at the same time that Micro$oft was starting up, I doubt that Micro$oft would still be in existence.

If IBM had marketed OS/2 as "Everything Windows/95 Wants To Be-- Without The Wait," Windoze/95 wouldn't have had a chance!

--Paul E musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Microsoft thwarted again , Jeff Crosby
RE: Microsoft thwarted again , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.