|
>> Was it a fair apples to apples comparison? > Not in my mind, Oracle was running on a big multi-processor > Solaris system with a EMC (but it wasn't EMC) kind of data-rack > with fibre connect. > SQL Server was running on a 2-way Intel with HT and local disks. > In my mind that stacks it in favour of Oracle, yes? How would I know? The Solaris system could have been running a few thousand processes, handling much more overall load than the Wintel server when your benchmark was run. What did you do to test performance? Nathan.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
