Dumb adopted authority question -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Dumb adopted authority question
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:25:35 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Folks:

If I am signed on as QSECOFR, and run a program (ILE CL) that is owned by a normal user and has USRPRF(*OWNER), what is the programs effective authority? QSECOFR or the users?

I've got a program that is being run as QSECOFR, but the USRPRF value is that of a normal user ... the program is failing when it's trying to switch profile handles to another *SECOFR profile because it does not have *USE authority to QSECOFR.

Thanks!

david
--
David Gibbs
david@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Receipt of this message does not grant you permission to send me Unsolicited Commercial Email

Follow-Ups:

Re: Dumb adopted authority question , Carel Teijgeler
Re: Dumb adopted authority question , Ed Fishel
Re: Dumb adopted authority question , Evan Harris
Re: Dumb adopted authority question , Scott Klement

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.