SNA over IP (Anynet) Versus Native SNA -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: SNA over IP (Anynet) Versus Native SNA
From: "Smith, Dave" <DSmith@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:12:10 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm looking for information on SNA over IP versus native SNA in regards
to performance.  For example, it takes 1 hour to do a SAVRSTLIB while
hooked up using native SNA, how much longer would it take to do the same
SAVRSTLIB over anynet.   What kind of overhead are we looking at?  Any
information is appreciated.  Thank you.

David Smith
IT Consultant

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.