RE: tape speeds, TSM and pase -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: tape speeds, TSM and pase
From: Evan Harris <spanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:05:09 +1200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Chris

The servers are on a dedicated 1gb segment of the network. I expect that the actual data transfer rates will probably exceed tape write rates and this is what we have seen for other systems using the TSM device.

Regards
Evan Harris

Direct attached will always beat LAN speeds unless you have some dedicated
High Speed Fiber between your backup server and iSeries to be backed up.

Chris Bipes

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: tape speeds, TSM and pase , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.