Re: disk cache batteries

[ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

When I had this problem at a previous job, we originally were going to wait
until the weekend to replace the failed cache battery (the performance hit
wasn't supposed to be very bad).  By the time 2 hours had gone by, we
changed our mind on that because batch jobs that had any I/O at all were
taking about 3 times longer than usual.  We ended up installing the battery
that night!


                                                                           
             "Jim Franz"                                                   
             <franz400@xxxxxxx                                             
             r.com>                                                     To 
             Sent by:                  <MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>           
             midrange-l-bounce                                          cc 
             s@xxxxxxxxxxxx                                                
                                                                   Subject 
                                       disk cache batteries                
             04/17/2005 06:29                                              
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             Midrange Systems                                              
                 Technical                                                 
                Discussion                                                 
             <midrange-l@midra                                             
                 nge.com>                                                  
                                                                           
                                                                           




We finally got thru our fix of disk cache batteries (iSeries 810 only
perhaps 4 years old).
The only clue we had was that the system became extremely slow during a
conversion test, running about 3 times slower. The CE claimed it shouldn't
have hit us that hard. I think otherwise - we were running large cpylib,
many chgpf's of big files, and adding 7 gig of files w/RPG to existing 10
gig.
Manager asking if I can prove it was the batteries (this was our final test
before go-live).
Can anyone else confirm losing cache batteries could cause such an effect?

btw- our only clue of hardware problem was wrkdsksts & F11 screen showed
disks in "degraded" status. After an ipl, we did get following 2 msgs in
qsysopr queue:
* *Attention*  Contact your hardware service provider now.
Message ID . . . . . . :   CPPEA12       Severity . . . . . . . :   99
A critical system hardware problem has occurred. Critical Message Handler
    has been run.
Message ID . . . . . . :   CPP8988       Severity . . . . . . . :   90

jim franz
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


_____________________________________________________________________________

Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________


ForwardSourceID:NT0001E496

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For 
more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________