On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 15:00 -0500, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Frankly I would rather not have a site limited in functionality because to 
> get some desired function would require something that 1% of the browsers 
> in existence do not use.  You can't tractor on the interstate; don't take 
> limited browsers on the information superhighway.

I think this is a flawed analogy.  If google can successfully index 8+
billion web pages and present the results in plain HTML and in such a
useful way, surely IBM could implement a similar mechanism for a few
hundred thousand pages of documentation.

In any case, my firefox 1.02 does work with the infocenter.  It's just a
waste of time to have to load a java applet.

--
Regards,
Rich

Current Conditions in Des Moines, IA
Broken Clouds
Temp 59F
Winds out of the North at 18, gusting to 29mph



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.