Re: Ports to block to limit the use of Client access Data transfer Facility -- MIDRANGE-L

To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Ports to block to limit the use of Client access Data transfer Facility
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 14:46:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505231250360.373@stumpy.hq.dans.com>
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

James,

I think trying to control it by controlling which emulator people use is a 
bad thing.  Then you'd have to scan every pc that attached to your lan for 
IBM's client access on a continual basis.  All it would take is one copy 
to break into the fort.  Better to control it on the server.

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

Re: Ports to block to limit the use of Client access Data transfer Facility , James Rich
Re: Ports to block to limit the use of Client access Data transferFacility , John Candidi

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.