Re: Ports to block to limit the use of Client access Data transfer Facility -- MIDRANGE-L

To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Ports to block to limit the use of Client access Data transfer Facility
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 14:46:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505231250360.373@stumpy.hq.dans.com>
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

James,

I think trying to control it by controlling which emulator people use is a 
bad thing.  Then you'd have to scan every pc that attached to your lan for 
IBM's client access on a continual basis.  All it would take is one copy 
to break into the fort.  Better to control it on the server.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Ports to block to limit the use of Client access Data transfer Facility , James Rich
Re: Ports to block to limit the use of Client access Data transferFacility , John Candidi

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.