RE: not allowing operator from end a specific job -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: not allowing operator from end a specific job
From: "phil Kestenbaum" <pkestenbaum@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:01:11 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Priority: normal

If you restrict them from ENDJOB by copying ENDJOB into another library, 
restrict authority for that operator for that comand in that library, you could 
restrict under certain circumstances as long as you set the library list 
appropriately.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lim Hock-Chai [mailto:Lim.Hock-Chai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 12:42 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: not allowing operator from end a specific job

Other than running the job with user ID that operator is not auth to, is there 
another way to not allowing operator from ending a specific job?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.