Re: Sentinel for orphaned jobs and hung devices -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Sentinel for orphaned jobs and hung devices
From: "James H H Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> What do you do if you have some jobs that are active, but the user has
> either gone away from their terminal or is just not keying anything? It
> seems that your routine to test last I/O would kill them also..

You must have missed the thread: to summarize, the application in question
is a public application, run from a totally hamstrung *USRPRF, running on
a series of *DEVDs that are set up to reject all other users, that is
already set up (in the application and the display file) to terminate
after 5 minutes of inactivity.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.