|
On 7/14/05, Scott Klement <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > However, I strongly suggest using LVLCHK(*YES) so that you CAN > deliberately break backward compatibility if you want to. With > LVLCHK(*NO), you've turned signature checking off completely, and thrown > away that useful capability. I can vouch for this. When we decided to start using service programs, we debated a number of methods for managing signatures and decided to use Scott's (after reading one of his articles). We have not needed to break backwards-compatibility, but it *is* nice to know that we can do it if we need to. Mike E.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
