Bind 8 is older than the hills.  Does IBM patch all the holes in it.
I believe the world uses 9.2.

BIND 8.4.6 should be secure. I agree that BIND 9 is a better choice, but we're pretty much at IBM's mercy, here. You either have to install/configure/support BIND manually without support from IBM, without their configuration wizard, without iSeries Nav help. -- or you have to comply with the version of BIND that IBM makes available for OS/400.

Personally, I do the really sensible thing -- I run my DNS on FreeBSD. Let the iSeries do what it's good at, database, RPG, other business logic. I can set up an old Pentium 100 system running FreeBSD w/BIND 9, with complete support for the latest updates from ISC, and it'll both outperform DNS on the iSeries and will cost basically nothing.


This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.