Re: Database Size Vs System Performance -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Database Size Vs System Performance
From: Scott Johnson <sjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:23:02 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I was not concerned about the DASD filling up. We would install another70GB or so before expanding anything. I was just concerned with howdoubling the DB size would affect system performance.


Thanks,
 Scott


rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

 That's a minuscule amount of objects. I'd be more worried about how
 full your disk gets and how that affects performance.

 Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Database Size Vs System Performance , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.