Re: Database Size Vs System Performance -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Database Size Vs System Performance
From: Scott Johnson <sjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:23:02 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I was not concerned about the DASD filling up. We would install another70GB or so before expanding anything. I was just concerned with howdoubling the DB size would affect system performance.


Thanks,
 Scott


rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

 That's a minuscule amount of objects. I'd be more worried about how
 full your disk gets and how that affects performance.

 Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

Re: Database Size Vs System Performance , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.