|
Narayanan R Pillai wrote:
Wilt,That is correct, There is only one part ( A-123-300 ). The users enter that as A-123300 or A123300 and we need to be able to match it to A-123-300.My concern really is that building an index on replace( part, '-', '' ) might impact performance, and not building it might impact the query. D**d if I do, D**d if I don't :/Pillai Wilt, Charles wrote:No,He said there are _NOT_ any parts that different only by where/how many dashes.The user will sometimes enter part A-123-300 as A-123300 or even A123300. But there's only one part. Charles Wilt -- iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America ph: 513-573-4343 fax: 513-398-1121-----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxxSent: Friday, August 19, 2005 1:42 PM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Re: SQL Query Scalar Function Versus Second Table Let me get this right.You have two items in your item master. One is A-123300 and one is A-123-300. Now the user enters a transaction for A-12-33-00. It should strip the dashes off of A-12-33-00 and post it to the first item in the item master that (when stripped of it's dashes) matches? So we don't care about the balance of A-123-300? We can always sum up the balance for A-123300 and A-123-300 to get the total balance?Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.