Re: Debugger - STRDBG/WDSC/other options -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Debugger - STRDBG/WDSC/other options
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:07:33 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Do they not like the WDSC debugger?  Or is it simply reluctance to change 
from the one they do like?  If so, you're wasting time looking for 
alternatives.
Is the WDSC debugger different than the CODE debugger, or are they one and 
the same?  I think they're the same now.  Anyway, I like it better than 
STRDBG.  Really cool that I can recompile the program and the debugger 
remembers which variables I was monitoring and where my breakpoints were.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.