Re: EMC DASD vs. IBM DASD and MIMIX for 24/7 operation -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: EMC DASD vs. IBM DASD and MIMIX for 24/7 operation
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:56:13 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I hate EMC dasd also because of a bad experience years ago.

However, Al, your customer should have checked their EMC level.  Much like 
we all have to check the Memo to User to find out that certain load source 
drives change, tape drives no longer supported, etc.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: EMC DASD vs. IBM DASD and MIMIX for 24/7 operation , Al Barsa

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.