Re: Some fodder for marketing, perhaps -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Some fodder for marketing, perhaps
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:27:17 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

There are many companies where twinax, if any, doesn't leave the machine 
room.  However it seems that you are predisposed to say that they just 
must have deep pockets.  I don't feel that is the reason.  As even former 
employees on this list have attested, we have found that twinax was a 
PITA.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Some fodder for marketing, perhaps , ChadB

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.