|
If you set a user profile to *disabled it will cause programs that use that user profile to fail. Not sure of the wisdom of setting any of the IBM Supplied user Profiles to password = *none. I'm hoping that you haven't set any of the User Profiles that have *secadm access set to *none. Have your SOX auditors called you to the carpet for that. If you are using any of the IBM Supplied user profiles to run scheduled jobs, I would recommend setting up clones of those user profiles so that you can disable your IBM supplied User Profiles, if your SOX Auditors recommend that. Joel B. Harvell Food Lion, LLC (704) 633-8250 x2709 jbharvell@xxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces+jbharvell=foodlion.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces+jbharvell=foodlion.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Wenzloff Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:56 AM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: User profile question Our SOX auditors are hounding me about User Profiles. I set most of the IBM supplied profiles to Password = *none. I did not change the Status to *Disabled because I don't know about all of the effects of doing that. The help window says: Status - Help Specifies whether the user profile is valid for sign on or for getting a profile handle. The possible values are: o *ENABLED: The user profile is valid. o *DISABLED: The user profile is not valid. What does "getting a profile handle" mean? Will a disabled profile prevent programs from running? Greg
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.