RE: CL program

["Eric Graeb" <egraeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

        Exactly right.  Since the question was for CL I responded in CL.
CLLE can do many things with less code but I'm still investigating it.
Thanks for the example of how it should be done.  I was thinking of trying
to follow through all the IF statements if you don't use procedure calls.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 4:41 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: CL program 

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Eric Graeb wrote:
>
> Yes, you can do it programmatically in CL but it would be lengthy.
>

Ummm...  not counting comments, or DCL statements, it's 4 lines of code.


/* NOTE:  This is ILE CL. Source type is CLLE (not CLP!)          +
                                                                   +
     To Compile:                                                   +
            CRTBNDCL PGM(ENDOFMON) SRCFILE(xxx/xxx)                */
PGM

     DCL VAR(&LILIAN)   TYPE(*CHAR) LEN(4)
     DCL VAR(&NOTUSED1) TYPE(*CHAR) LEN(8)
     DCL VAR(&NOTUSED2) TYPE(*CHAR) LEN(23)
     DCL VAR(&LIBNAME)  TYPE(*CHAR) LEN(7)

     /* Get the Year & Month from 15 days ago.  For example, if    +
        today is Jan 5, 2006 get DEC2005, if today is Feb 16 2006, +
        get FEB2006 */

     CALLPRC PRC(CEELOCT) PARM(&LILIAN &NOTUSED1 &NOTUSED2 *OMIT)
     CHGVAR VAR(%BIN(&LILIAN)) VALUE(%BIN(&LILIAN) - 15)
     CALLPRC PRC(CEEDATE) PARM(&LILIAN 'MMMYYYY' &LIBNAME *OMIT)

     /* Create the "End of Month" library */

     CRTLIB LIB(&LIBNAME)

ENDPGM


I don't know precisely how the OP was planning to do the logic for 
figuring out the month (which is why I didn't post anything earlier). 
In my sample code, I assume that if you run this during the first 15 days 
of the month that you're running it for the previous month...  but I don't 
know what the OP intended for that, I got lost trying to follow the logic 
in his text.

But, surely this doesn't qualify as "lengthy code"?!