|
Had this bite me sumthin' terrible in the backside two weeks ago when I was filling in for our night operator. Scenario: Had this long-running batch job with numerous steps. Run docs said that "once job ABC hits <this point>, you can submit job XYZ." This is almost mandated as XYZ is also a long-running job which could impact users if it doesn't complete before 6 a.m. So, I gets smart, and CHGJOB ABC LOG(4 00 *SECLVL) LOGCLPGM(*YES). I step away to do some other things, return and see the dreaded CPF2526 and "Job Ended"! Everything was going so well up to that point! (Yes, I checked the job log system values *after* the fact. *NOWRAP is not my friend.) After several "Oh Ship!" iterations, I check the job log. 20 gazillion messages related to repeated calls to an OPM (date routine) program. OK, so I've identified a performance hog that we should take care of. Once upon a time ago, I could have swore that, when the job log filled up, instead of immediately killing a job, the operator was presented with the option to extend the job log, or do a *PRTWRAP, or *WRAP, and let the job continue. Oh, plus the option to kill the job. Given the system values (QJOBMSGQ*) that I see now related to this, I don't see how this could have been done in the past. Unless IBM tooketh away... Did we have this ability before? Or was I dreaming? Doesn't seem like it would be more sane to have this option? Thanks, Dan
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.