RE: Service Program Signatures and Change Management

["Fleming, Greg \(ED\)" <GFLEMING@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just got an update from the nice lady at MKS.  Seems there is a data
area we can update to turn off related object processing for service
programs, which presumably would make using binder source worthwhile.  

Greg

|-----Original Message-----
|From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-
|bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fleming, Greg (ED)
|Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 11:41 AM
|To: midrange-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|Subject: Service Program Signatures and Change Management
|

|Premise1: The value of using binder source is that it allows me to NOT
|compile calling programs which don't use the latest procedure.
|
|Premise2: Implementer (and presumably other change management products)
|recompile all related objects behind the scenes anyway.
|
|Conclusion: Therefore, if using change management, there is no value in
|using binder source.
|
|
|
|Is there anything wrong with my logic ?
|