According to people who are a lot smarter than me, CRTJVAPGM is deprecated
in favor of the JIT compiler, especially in later releases of the JVM.  It
seems that the JIT compiler can do a better job of optimization based on the
actual usage of a piece of code than CRTJVAPGM can, since the latter is
based solely on static information.  This has evidently been the case since
about V5R1 or V5R2.

Don't hold me to that, though.  I haven't run any benchmarks to identify
which might be faster.  It's worth a shot, and as Scott says, let us know
what happens.

Joe

> From: Scott Klement
> 
> One thing you might try (from that thread that Leif pointed to) is
> optimizing the JAR files.  That's a really good idea, it hadn't occurred
> to me.  Please read the thread for details:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1374914&forum_id=500030
> 
> Let us know if that makes any difference -- I'd be very interested in how
> much difference it makes.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.