|
On 23/02/2006, at 8:40 AM, Barbara Morris wrote:
If you choose to specify a constant manual signature you must ensureyou never change the order of the exports and always add new exports atthe end of the list. I don't think much of that idea because it's not as flexible as supporting previous signatures.Simon, the rule about not changing the order of the exports also appliesto *PRV signatures. See this post which describes an experiment using all three approaches to handling signatures:
Yes, I know that but I didn't want to get into a gory discussion of the subtleties with those who think the requirement to add exports at the end makes previous signatures useless.
I don't think I wrote the paragraph you quoted very well. I didn't mean I didn't like adding exports at the end. I meant I didn't like the single signature idea.
Regards, Simon Coulter. -------------------------------------------------------------------- FlyByNight Software AS/400 Technical Specialists http://www.flybynight.com.au/ Phone: +61 3 9419 0175 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\ Fax: +61 3 9419 0175 \ / X ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \ --------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.