|
Rob, I think I've said something via email to Mark. I know that Chris will be down here on 4/12 to meet with Mark. Perhaps with him, I, and Darryl P. in a room we can reiterate. I attended a ITIL Tivoli thing in NYC a few months ago and put the lack of OS/400 support as a barrier to further implementations on their questionnaire.....of course I never heard squat back. The issue I have is that we are light users of Linux and in all honesty the thought of becoming heavy users is not something I look forward to. I'm not bashing Linux (at least in this thread), it's an issue of time, people, and cost. And there is always a cost associated with implementing new servers or partitions. It's not something we take lightly - I argue with my boss constantly about limiting partitions and servers. Just because you can do it doesn't mean that you should.... I wonder if we should try to bring together more people who have an issue with this....for those attending Common and possibly something beyond that? Mike -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 10:45 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: RE: Final word on TSM and V5R4 of i5/os Mike, I don't know. You can bet that my boss has talked to Mark about it already. I think my boss is about to accept defeat. If he can find more who care... Rob Berendt
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.