|
Rob In your message you stated you are moving from group profiles to authorization lists. I would ask why the change? I don’t see one method as a replacement for the other. Group profiles are best used to manage groups of profiles with that need common authority to objects. Authorization lists, work in a similarly way with other system objects. They make “groups” of objects easier to maintain by use of the authorization list. I would recommend you continue to use group profiles to manage users with similar security needs (users in a department). Use the authorization list to manage multiple objects through one management point. An example of how we use an authorization list is to manage a list of workstations that security officer profiles are authorized to sign onto. There is one authorization list that is used on all workstation devices that a security officer can sign on to. When a new security officer profile is created that user profile is entered into the authorization list. Joe Hainey
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.