RE: ODBC vs OLE DB/400

["Jones, John \(US\)" <John.Jones@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, could whoever answers also compare ODBC & OLE to JDBC and
using the iSeries as a .NET provider?

My main concern is performance on the iSeries side.

John A. Jones, CISSP
Americas Information Security Officer
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
V: +1-630-455-2787 F: +1-312-601-1782
john.jones@xxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Candidi
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 7:12 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: ODBC vs OLE DB/400

What are the differences/advantages/disadvantages of using one over the
other or doesn't it matter?

 

John A Candidi

Rutgers Insurance Companies

IT Director - AS/400 Manager

856-779-2274

 

 

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only.  If you have 
received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and then 
delete it.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, 
disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior permission.  
We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software 
viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment 
to this message.  We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by 
software viruses.  The information contained in this communication may be 
confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. If you are 
the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar electronic 
messages from us in future then please respond to the sender to this effect.