|
I was one of the early V5R2 adopters and had huge issues with temporary storage and performance on my 270. I had days where I would accumulate 80GB to 100GB of allocated temporary storage. After 8 months of keeping up with cum's and hypers, everything evened out. I typically don't exceed 18GB of temp allocations now. Definitely make sure your Hyper's and performance PTF's are up to date. Ryan "Bryan Dietz" <BDietz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:OF5BE40421.0778D34E-ON85257148.00633355-85257148.00636628@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > What does the WRKPTFGRP screen look like?? make sure you are current on > PTF's > > Is the system tuning the memory pools? dspsysval qpfradj > > > _____________________________ > Bryan Dietz > Aktion Associates > > > > midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 04/06/2006 01:48:47 PM: > > -> > -> This isn't an RPG issue, so I'm replying to MIDRANGE-L. > -> > -> I've had HORRIBLE performance since upgrading to V5R3. It's not one > thing > -> being slower, it's everything. V5R3 is a terrible performer, there's > no > -> question about it. > -> > -> Talking to various people, they told me: > -> > -> suggestion: The cache battery on your disks may be dead. > -> reply: It's not. > -> > -> > -> suggestion: You need more memory, the upgrade to V5R3 was the straw > that > -> broke the camels back. > -> > -> reply: I doubled the memory, and although it's faster than it was > before, > -> it's still much slower than V5R2 > -> > -> > -> suggestion: You could X and Y and that'd make your applications more > -> efficient. > -> > -> reply: True, but this didn't change when I upgraded to V5R3. They were > -> like this on V5R2, and writing new, more optimized, code for every > program > -> on my system just so that the operating system doesn't seem so slow > seems > -> like a workaround rather than a solution. > -> > -> > -> All of the "experts" I've talked to have told me that V5R3 performs > just > -> as well as V5R2. I checked into this before I upgraded. However, > there's > -> absolutely no question that this isn't true. I suspect that somewhere > in > -> all the changes of the virtualization engine, they did something that > -> slows it all down. > -> > -> At this point, though, i'm stuck with it until we're able to budget for > a > -> faster computer. (We're running a 270) > -> > -> --- > -> Scott Klement http://www.scottklement.com > -> > > -> > -- > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.