RE: WRKSBMJOB taking a long time. -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: WRKSBMJOB taking a long time.
From: "Henza, Guy" <GHenza@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:06:10 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

WRKSBMJOB has always taken a long time.  WRKUSRJOB is faster and more
versatile. 
 
Regards, 
 
Guy 

------------------------------

date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:01:13 -0400
from: "rick baird" <rick.baird@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: WRKSBMJOB taking a long time.

Would any of you have an idea why a simple WRKSBMJOB command (no
parms) would take 15-20 seconds to load?

When I run it, it only displays 2 entries and it doesn't seem to make
a difference who runs it, it takes forever.

refresh takes as long as well.

I've been on busier systems than this, so it doesn't seem to make any
sense to me.

Thanks,

Rick

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.