>>Also, can someone please recommend a good Redbook that discusses Stored
>>Procedures on the i5?

Modernizing IBM eServer iSeries Application Data Access - A Roadmap
Cornerstone
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246393.html?Open

Stored Procedures, Triggers and User Defined Functions on DB2 Universal
Database for iSeries
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246503.html?Open

Birgitta

"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance"
(Derek Bok)
 
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Brian Piotrowski
Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Mai 2006 14:17
An: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Betreff: Stored Procedures vs. SQL Statements vs. CHAIN

Hi All,

 

Can someone tell me in terms of speed which method would be best when
working with multiple records?  Right now my code uses a series of SQL
statements to update several hundred records in one shot.  I'm thinking
about moving these statements to a stored procedure instead, but I
wanted to weigh my choices against a good old CHAIN command as well.

 

Anyone have any thoughts or comments?

 

Also, can someone please recommend a good Redbook that discusses Stored
Procedures on the i5?

 

Thanks!

 

Brian.

 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Brian Piotrowski

Specialist - I.T.

Simcoe Parts Service, Inc.

PH: 705-435-7814

FX: 705-435-6746

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

 


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.