Re: Performance of ODBC vs. other access methods

["Tom Jedrzejewicz" <tomjedrz@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 9/5/06, Dave Odom <Dave.Odom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
Yes, very aware of all the "depends" but that doesn't answer my basic
> questions which were:
>
> "What's the prevailing wisdom backed up by real world experience when
> using ODBC from whatever tool or programming language to access
> DB2/400 or ORACLE versus using some other remote or distributed access
> method
> such as DRDA, calls to stored procedures or API calls?   I've been
> told that ODBC is a good performer but have my doubts.
>
> What's your experience show vs Ivory Tower tests?"



I think it does answer your question, although it isn't an answer that helps
much.

I interpret "it depends" to mean that there is no prevailing wisdom.  I give
that answer a lot of credence because it was offered by several luninaries
in the community.

Obviously, if I am interpreting incorrectly I hope someone will correct me.

Take care ...