RE: Pause technique

["Wilt, Charles" <CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not sure that counts.

> From the name, "Recover Interrupted Job" it doesn't sound like the kind
of routine checkpointing we were discussing.

Stuff happens, we all know that. Just having a recover tool isn't a bad
thing.  It's the routine use of the recovery tool that I'd have a
problem with.

Imagine having to do a RCLSTG once a day.  That would tell me something
is wrong.

Charles Wilt
--
iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America
ph: 513-573-4343
fax: 513-398-1121
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger Harman
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:11 PM
> To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Pause technique
>
> Island Pacific (Retail Merchandise)
> They have a process for "Recover Interrupted Job"
>
>
> > > > CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx 09/28/2006 6:50:15 AM >>>
> <snip>
> Lastly, I have to wonder, what is the percentages of home-grown vs.
> third party software that use this technique of checkpoint validation
> restartability.  Off the top of my head I can't think of a third party
> package that does it, but I've not seen all that many.  Every 
> place I've
> seen it was a home-grown application.  That tells us something I
> think....
> </snip>
> -- 
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion 
> (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.