RE: Why do computers still have disk drives?

["DeLong, Eric" <EDeLong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

IBM has been flirting with holographic memory systems for awhile, too...

http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/443/ashley.html

Eric DeLong
Sally Beauty Company
MIS-Project Manager (BSG)
940-297-2863 or ext. 1863



-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Peter Dow (ML)
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:21 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Why do computers still have disk drives?


Several months ago I remember hearing that Samsung was working on a 
32GB  memory chip, and this article from 09/11/2006 seems to indicate 
they're getting closer: http://www.deviceforge.com/news/NS4990922808.html.

Also, it uses CTF (Charge Trap Flash) technology, so perhaps reliability 
and speed will be improved.

Tom Jedrzejewicz wrote:
> On 10/6/06, Greg Wenzloff <GWenzloff@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
> > It's Friday -- often a quieter day in the office.
> >
> > I was wondering why don't new computers like the i5 just have solid
> > state memory and forget about disk drives.   Think about it.   You can
> > get a 2GB thumb drive for $75 or less.    Why can't the manufacturers
> > just load about 200 GB of this solid state memory into the machine?
> > Think of the speed improvement.
> >     
>
>