|
James, There were on V3R2 - think they were concerned about stuff like that ? :-) Chuck -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James H H Lampert Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:40 PM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Re: CISC to RISC Circa 2006 (was RE: V5R4 upgrade from V5R3) Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The "only" issues that have come up are security issues due to the fact that the V3R2 was running at seclvl=10 and they went to 40.
Security 10?!?!? Did you read them the riot act? I have a poster I designed many years ago about security levels. I just stuck a PDF of it online http://www.hb.quik.com/jamesl/SecOnAS400.pdf -- JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.