Why isn't a QPADEV* name used? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Why isn't a QPADEV* name used?
From: "Burns, Bryan" <Bryan_Burns@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:46:07 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I have some type 3477 device descriptions that are hard coded names for java 
based emulators.  When I connect a CLI thin client and leave the device name 
blank, the system uses one on the hard coded names for the java based emulators 
instead of using a QPADEV* name.  How can I get the thin clients to use a 
QPADEV* name?  

Bryan Burns
M.I.S. Department
ECHO, Incorporated

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Why isn't a QPADEV* name used? , Haase, Justin C.
Re: Why isn't a QPADEV* name used? , Pete Helgren

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.