|
On 12/11/06, Tom Liotta <qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Steve Richter wrote: > ... IBM has > to contribute also. It has to stop gearing down the CPU and charge > market prices for the system. It can take a lot of CPW to render > markup text to a browser like client and the fractional core i5s that > IBM is currently shipping dont have it. Which competing servers use their CPW to "render markup text to a browser like client"? Don't they pretty much leave that up to the client?
your right Tom, thank you. whatever the term is for what the server does to interpret the text stream from the client, then compose the markup data stream and the state data and send it to the client takes a lot of CPW. -Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
