|
I have always envisioned the iSeries to be a better manager of CPU cycles and memory. So my question is this: Are CPU cycles on the iSeries side the same as on the Windows side? What I mean by that is I would imagine that OS/400 is more optimally written to handle enterprise level needs and if one was to throw the same at a Windows machine it would not compare. On the same note we should look at what we are getting per processing cycle (kinda going back to an earlier post of mine). With the iSeries we can some pretty solid job logs and error tracking capabilities. All that comes at a cost, but in the end is a benefit that must be factored in when saying this Xeon proc is much faster and cheap than the iSeries equivalent. I would have to believe that part of the reason the iSeries is so expensive on the hardware side is because they are trying to recoup costs from operating system development and DB development - etc. Thoughts? Aaron Bartell http://mowyourlawn.com -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 5:19 PM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: RE: Saving the System i: Fight Rather Than Switch
Just trying to add some reality into the mix.
Fair enough, and I'd agree with your pricing (roughly), however, I think the point was, those two machines, while costing the same, aren't even close in processing power. A 8-way Xeon w/8Gig will blow the doors off that System i spec. Are there cheaper System i's, yes. And there are cheaper Dells too. 2 Quad-code Xeons is a _lot_ of processing power! Besides, let's face it, the spec is silly anyway. If you've got an 8-way machine you're not loading it w/4 146Gig 15K drives and SQL Server, you'd be so disk-bound it wouldn't be funny. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.