Re: Saving the System i: Fight Rather Than Switch

[Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Based on your message traffic, most of what you deal with
is either broke or going to be broke, so finding an error
in SEU is certainly within the scope of what you do.

My point was, that using a shoddy product to develop programs
is not acceptable to me. I see way too much traffic on
how wonderful WDSc could be if you could just keep it running.

That traffic has been going on for a number of years at this
point.

If you find it acceptable, press on with your development
using all these wonderful, "modern" tools, but please don't
point out to me how outdated I have been in using a tool that
works.




rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> We've had this argument before.  Even if you got the MCH errors, etc that 
> I've received with SEU you probably wouldn't even change.
>
> Then we get into the really esoteric argument in the difference between 
> broke and featureless.  There are so many things lacking in SEU that are 
> built in to WDSC that I call SEU broke.  At most, others may grudgingly 
> admit that SEU lacks a few features.