|
This has turned into a WDSc vs SEU which is hardly a fair comparison. I was NOT defending the use of SEU. Those of you that support WDSc, should go forward and continue to push for more great products like this from IBM. I doubt anything I say is going to matter one whit, but I had just grown weary of hearing how great this product is when I see and hear a great deal to the contrary. You and Joe are great supporters of the product and I would hope you can convert many other folks over to that method. I suspect David and many others have grown pretty sick of this little discussion. Jon Paris wrote:
I don't accept "broken" software - But I am realistic enough to know that as long as it runs on Windows, there is nothing that IBM do that will _ever_ make it 100% bullet proof. I have way more failures with iSeries Access than with WDSC.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.