|
Elvis, I thought about using case to replace bad values with null but that will still include the record in the count won't it? Or, does it keep a separate count of occurrences by field? Maybe I'm making this harder than it is. Rick
-----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elvis Budimlic Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 1:35 PM To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' Subject: RE: Omit record from SQL AVG based on field value Rick, I don't know where to start with your SQL statement, it's too much work for Friday afternoon :( I do believe that what you need is to simply ignore the fields where you have no values by casting them to NULLs. You do this with CASE clause. I googled and found this link that illustrates the point: http://www.craigsmullins.com/ssu_0899.htm See SQL statement #3. If you can simplify your statement or at least narrow down the problem, post back. Elvis Celebrating 10-Years of SQL Performance Excellence
Privileged and Confidential. This e-mail, and any attachments there to, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this e-mail. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.