|
You were right, this really is too much for a Friday afternoon. I used Chris's method and realized that the differences were all negative and I've been doing the subtraction backwards all this time. That's why the case wouldn't work like I wanted it to. Let's see if I can figure it out now. Thanks, Rick
-----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elvis Budimlic Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 2:22 PM To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' Subject: RE: Omit record from SQL AVG based on field value There is nothing syntactically or logically wrong with your statement. Make sure locftst is greater than locbtst in some of the rows at least. Elvis Celebrating 10-Years of SQL Performance Excellence
Privileged and Confidential. This e-mail, and any attachments there to, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this e-mail. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.