|
Here's a sample: Volume ---Temporary Errors--- --------M Bytes-------- ID Read Write Read Written HDTGL1 0 0 1 1103725 HDTGL2 0 0 1 524278 HDTGL3 0 0 1 287209 From, basically, a full system save. SAVSYS The save operation ended on volume HDTGL1. SAVLIB *NONSYS The save operation ended on volume HDTGL1. SAVDLO CPI6705-3036 blocks were processed for file label QDOC, sequence 879 for volume HDTGL1 loaded on device TAPMLB02. The maximum block size is 262144. The tape file was opened at 02/10/07 07:36:31 and closed at 02/10/07 07:36:55. The total time the file was open was 24 seconds. The save request ended on volume HDTGL1 SAV (ifs stuff) (a vast majority of our data is here. We have more free space than what is used by *NONSYS.) started 02/10/07 07:36:58.918520 02/10/07 08:48 - CPI6705-1621973 blocks were processed for file label SAV20070210, sequence 880 for volume HDTGL1 loaded on device TAPMLB02. The maximum block size is 262144. The tape file was opened at 02/10/07 07:37:07 and closed at 02/10/07 08:48:18. The total time the file was open was 4271 seconds. 02/10/07 08:51 - The next volume that is inserted on device TAPMLB02 has volume identifier HDTGL2. 02/10/07 10:29 - CPI6705-2080471 blocks were processed for file label SAV20070210, sequence 880 for volume HDTGL2 loaded on device TAPMLB02. The maximum block size is 262144. The tape file was opened at 02/10/07 08:51:21 and closed at 02/10/07 10:28:55. The total time the file was open was 5854 seconds. 02/10/07 10:31 - The next volume that is inserted on device TAPMLB02 has volume identifier HDTGL3. 02/10/07 11:17 - CPI6705-1139719 blocks were processed for file label SAV20070210, sequence 880 for volume HDTGL3 loaded on device TAPMLB02. The maximum block size is 262144. The tape file was opened at 02/10/07 10:31:58 and closed at 02/10/07 11:17:47. The total time the file was open was 2749 seconds. 02/10/07 11:17 - 130528 objects were saved on volumes HDTGL1 HDTGL2 HDTGL3 sequence number 880 at 02/10/07 07:37:01. The save operation ended on volume HDTGL3. Ok, so it didn't fill the 3rd tape. However I refuse to believe that the difference between the first two is the manufacturing anomaly. Doing all of the ifs save to one file number (880) may be a factor. Maybe our IFS data is more compressed than DB2 data? Funny thing is that it only took the IFS save 1 hour and 40 minutes to fill the second tape. And the IFS used the first tape for 1 hour and 15 minutes. So, does that mean that (75 minutes)/(100 minutes) of tape 1 is also IFS data? Would adding up all of the CPI6705 messages mean anything? Note: There are a LOT of CPI6705 messages for the *NONSYS. Really starts to clutter up the joblog. Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.