|
That doesn't sound correct. Cpyfrmqryf needs a open data path to copy from. Job logs are not real clear when checking on opnqryf. That's a really large file to be using opnqryf against. That job must run for a while ? Wouldn't a logical make more sense ? Is the job doing record selection or just using opnqryf to sort the file ? You could actually end up with "2" files of 25mb using this method. Douglas Palme wrote:
We are running a CL in batch that is opening a query file over a PF with approx 25m records, the next line of code is CPYFRMQRYF.
In checking the job log it appears that BOTH are running simultaneously.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
