I'm working with an application that updates tables via the web.  The web
application is using commitment control to back out any updates/inserts to
the table if an error is found during validation.  I've never seen
commitment control used in this way.  Is this a common use of commitment
control?  

 

To make it more complicated there is a trigger on the file that the web
application is using.  Is there any way the web application and the trigger
can share the same commitment control?  I don't want the trigger to run if
the web application does a roll back.  The trigger is activated when a row
is inserted into the table and a program is submitted to batch to continue
processing.  The batch program also uses commitment control. 

 

 

Judy Osell



 


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.