Re: Adopted authority and triggers -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Adopted authority and triggers
From: Ed Fishel <edfishel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:58:17 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Brian wrote on 04/04/2007 09:37:28 AM:

Why is it recommended that the trigger program reside in the same library

the physical file it is attached to?

I am a security guy and not a data base guy. My understanding is that a
trigger program is part of the data base. It should be saved and restored
with the data base, copied with the data base, etc. (There is probably more
to it that these reasons.) With this in mind it makes sense that a user
should not need authority to the trigger program or its library. The system
should always be able to call the trigger program when the user is
authorized to open the file.

Ed Fishel,
edfishel@xxxxxxxxxx

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Adopted authority and triggers , Brian
RE: Adopted authority and triggers , Walden H. Leverich

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.